American http://www.prideof-america.org News Sat, 11 Nov 2017 00:56:28 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.8.3 North Carolina Has Made Drug Testing MANDATORY For Welfare Recipients – Here Are The Results (For The People That Actually Showed Up For The Test) http://www.prideof-america.org/2017/11/11/north-carolina-has-made-drug-testing-mandatory-for-welfare-recipients-here-are-the-results-for-the-people-that-actually-showed-up-for-the-test/ http://www.prideof-america.org/2017/11/11/north-carolina-has-made-drug-testing-mandatory-for-welfare-recipients-here-are-the-results-for-the-people-that-actually-showed-up-for-the-test/#respond Sat, 11 Nov 2017 00:56:28 +0000 http://www.prideof-america.org/?p=649 ]]>

North Carolina has taken a common sense approach to weed out those people taking advantage of the state’s welfare system.

The state wanted to test 159 people, which was 2% of total welfare applicants, for the presence of drugs. We assume these people were screened based on factors like previous drug convictions.

Of those 159 slated for screening, roughly half showed up, and 89 were tested. The other 70 welfare applicants inexplicably chose to skip the drug test.

Of the 89 who were checked, 21 were discovered to have the presence of drugs in their system.

This amounts to almost a quarter of all of those tested to be found with illegal substances in their system. These applicants were asked to repay the state the $55 testing fee.

Liberals might look at 23.5% and suggest that the number is not as bad as people make it sound, but they would be forgetting that 70 people did not show up to be tested when they were asked to.

While we don’t have the reasons for their absences, common sense might indicate that they were worried about the results of the tests.

If that was the case, and if they had tested positive, it would have propelled the first round of testing from 23.5% to well over 50%.

Some liberals are arguing that only .3 tested positive under the bizarre math that everyone that was not tested would have had a negative result and so they should just add those people to the math. And to make this math more bizarre is assumes that people selected who didn’t show up for the test, that potentially lost benefits by not showing up, all were drug free as well.

But even accepting the logic the pre screening is 100% effective is still not a good argument against this program. This program targeted likely drug users. And therefore it seems fairly effective considering the high rate of people either failing the test or now showing up for the test (which again many of the people that failed to show up likely realized they would fail the test). For the population tested the test resulted in 25% positive screenings. This means that a simple $55 likely results in tax payer savings (Or instead of savings that money could be used to fund scholarships for low income high school students). And the people that didn’t show up the cost of the test was $0 and also resulted in savings.

So in summary here is what we know and don’t know.

1) In the test 159 people were selected to be likely drug users 44% of the people (70) failed to show up for the test. Of those that showed up for the test 23.5% of them failed the test. So if all 159 people were tested the percent that would have tested positive would have been between 21 (13.2%) and 91 (57.2%). My guess is that number would be closer to 57% than 13%. But without hard data we don’t know either way.

2) We don’t know what the results would be if everyone in the entire population was tested. Its highly doubtful it would be .3 percent. But that said my guess is that it would be far lower than the percent that tested positive in the test sample. So without actual data its hard to know if testing everyone would be cost effective.

My guess is that testing everyone screened as a likely drug user would be effective since it was effective in this case. And then doing 2% random testing would be effective in the sense that people using money for drugs would be less likely to sign up for welfare. The reason this seems true is because in this test 44% of the people flagged failed to show up for the test. That way you are testing and screening people most likely to be active drug users that would use welfare to buy drugs. And you are potentially deterring other people from applying since they would be worried about being randomly selected if they are active drug users.

The idea behind the drug testing is pretty simple.

The tax payers work hard for their money, and their occupations vary. Many of those people paying taxes are forced to take drug tests for their jobs.

The State, gets to tax those wages to do things to benefit the collective.

One of those things that the government has chosen to handle is the caring for of those who can not seemingly make enough money to care for themselves.

The government provides for these less fortunates with the money that it has collected from the tax payers.

If those seeking welfare are in fact using their own money to buy illegal drugs, then they are abusing the system by using it as a supplement to their personal income.

In addition, if someone is an active drug user it makes little sense to give them money that could be used to buy additional drugs. In short giving active drug users money is bad for tax payers and could also be bad for the drug users.

They should be using their money to get themselves back on their feet, and to buy their household’s food, but they are clearly not doing so if they are purchasing drugs.

Why should the tax payers be burdened with taking care of someone who wants to sit at home and smoke weed?

What do you think about the drug testing of welfare applicants? Is it fair, or asking too much of applicants?

Source: US Herald

Source:breitbart

Correction:
There was a picture previously in this article. It was a typical photo of a welfare office. The article is about North Carolina. The previous picture was from New Jersey. It was the building door for 50 South Clinton Street, East Orange, NJ at the Essex County Welfare building and Unemployment Office.

Although the picture was of a welfare office it was of a welfare office in another state therefore the picture has been removed.

We want to thank a reader for sending us this information.

Also we want to note that the article has been updated to reflect that the people tested were chosen based on the fact they had previous drug convictions.

]]>
http://www.prideof-america.org/2017/11/11/north-carolina-has-made-drug-testing-mandatory-for-welfare-recipients-here-are-the-results-for-the-people-that-actually-showed-up-for-the-test/feed/ 0
Actress Sandra Bullock To Hillary Clinton: “If You Don’t Like Our President You Can Leave And Never Come Back Again, You Are One Jealous Woman Who Is Nothing To Compare With Trump, I Hope He Will Arrest You Soon”. Do You Support Her? http://www.prideof-america.org/2017/11/11/actress-sandra-bullock-to-hillary-clinton-if-you-dont-like-our-president-you-can-leave-and-never-come-back-again-you-are-one-jealous-woman-who-is-nothing-to-compare-with-trump-i-h/ http://www.prideof-america.org/2017/11/11/actress-sandra-bullock-to-hillary-clinton-if-you-dont-like-our-president-you-can-leave-and-never-come-back-again-you-are-one-jealous-woman-who-is-nothing-to-compare-with-trump-i-h/#respond Sat, 11 Nov 2017 00:32:25 +0000 http://www.prideof-america.org/?p=646 ]]>

Sandra Bullock says she’s not “politically vocal” but that doesn’t mean she isn’t opinionated when it comes to America’s leadership.

“I just want what’s best for our country,” Bullock said during a press conference for her new film, Our Brand Is Crisis, in Los Angeles on Friday.

 

Bullock, who plays Jane “Calamity” Bodine, a political strategist, in the upcoming movie, says her own views are colored by her son Louis.

“I would like my rights represented and those of my son – very selfish views and I think everyone else has them,” she says. “When this film came along, it came along at a time that I was having that internal discussion with myself about who in our country would step out of their comfort zone to help others for the greater good.”

Bullock, who says she’d “do anything” for her son, said this “internal discussion” hinged largely on who else, on a larger scale, would work to represent Louis’ best interests.

Bullock, who plays Jane “Calamity” Bodine, a political strategist, in the upcoming movie, says her own views are colored by her son Louis.

“I would like my rights represented and those of my son – very selfish views and I think everyone else has them,” she says. “When this film came along, it came along at a time that I was having that internal discussion with myself about who in our country would step out of their comfort zone to help others for the greater good.”

Bullock, who says she’d “do anything” for her son, said this “internal discussion” hinged largely on who else, on a larger scale, would work to represent Louis’ best interests.

“What people would still get together and protest for the greater good? Have we all gotten too scared and too safe?” she asked.

The 51-year-old’s current political mindset was also influenced heavily by her parents. After growing up in a split home – one parent was a Republican, the other a Democrat – she says she learned how to push the limits.

The Oscar-winner says that her mother “did things that were definitely ahead of her time, as a woman.”

“I never realized that there were limitations where I was looked at as less than until I was actually pretty deep in this business and I had a pretty unsettling moment, and I went ‘Oh my god, I’m being treated this way because I’m female,’ ” she said.

How Sandra Bullock Found Happiness with Her ‘Great Guy’ Bryan Randall: All the Details of Their New Romance!

“I grew up to be exactly who I was supposed to be and have the opinions I wanted to have and didn’t realize there were limitations to that,”

she adds. “So I thought, politically, I was pretty open minded and could speak my mind and then I realized I wasn’t supposed to.”

]]>
http://www.prideof-america.org/2017/11/11/actress-sandra-bullock-to-hillary-clinton-if-you-dont-like-our-president-you-can-leave-and-never-come-back-again-you-are-one-jealous-woman-who-is-nothing-to-compare-with-trump-i-h/feed/ 0
BILL CLINTON CALLS PRESIDENT TRUMP A DICTATOR AND LIAR http://www.prideof-america.org/2017/11/11/bill-clinton-calls-president-trump-a-dictator-and-liar/ http://www.prideof-america.org/2017/11/11/bill-clinton-calls-president-trump-a-dictator-and-liar/#respond Sat, 11 Nov 2017 00:21:39 +0000 http://www.prideof-america.org/?p=643 ]]>

Serial s*x offender Bill Clinton knows a lot about dicks, but when it comes to dictators, not so much. The former president called the current President a dictator, forgetting that this is the United Sates and we have a Constitution full of checks and balances that stops anyone from having absolute power. Clearly he’s still upset that Donald Trump kicked his wife’s ass in last year’s election. He was counting on Hillary being president so she would be too preoccupied to notice his naughty behavior.

 

Clinton was on Conan O’Brein Wednesday proving that two irrelevants don’t make anything relevant. Bubba started out by rambling on how unfair the media coverage was for Hillary leading up to the election. You know, because the liberal media who tried everything they could to put Hillary in the White House was somehow working against her. They were probably hacked by the Russians.

Then, this ridiculous thing came out of Bill’s mouth:

“And the Dictators Club in the world, they want two things. They want nuclear weapons, because they feel like they can never be dislodged no matter how much people hate them if they’ve got nuclear power. And they want to abolish the line between fact and fiction and truth and lie, because they figure if you don’t what’s true and you don’t think you could ever know, pretty soon, everybody will accept the fact that democracy’s no longer possible,” said Clinton.

“Are you talking about foreign countries now or here, because that shook me to the bone for a second,” asked O’Brien.

 

Clinton paused for a long moment and tried to speak but couldn’t form any words.

“You just said a lot by saying nothing,” said” O’Brien.

Clearly Clinton was talking about Trump and he confirmed it by not denying it. Bill Clinton, a former POTUS, called the current President a dictator and a lair on national (sort of) TV. It’s complete bullshit, but a serious charge nonetheless. In his sly Clinton-esque way, he just questioned the legitimacy of the United States government. That could actually be considered sedition, but you know Bill doesn’t care about no sticking’ laws.

I’m not even sure what Clinton is basing this on, other than sour grapes. It’s not like Donald Trump has overstepped his Constitutional authority like Barack Obama did. It’s not like Donald Trump broke the law like Bill Clinton did. What exactly makes Trump a dictator? Because he’s undoing years of destructive liberalism? Whether the left likes it or not, everything Trump is doing is well within his defined powers.

The funniest thing about this mini-rant is Bill’s insistence that Trump is a liar. You may remember that Clinton was convicted of perjury, which is lying under oath. He was stripped of his law license and even impeached by the House of Representatives. Much like how he has no room to call Trump a sexual abuser, Clinton has no standing in questioning anyone’s honesty.

]]>
http://www.prideof-america.org/2017/11/11/bill-clinton-calls-president-trump-a-dictator-and-liar/feed/ 0
Muslim Figure: “We Must Have Pork-Free Menus Or We Will Leave U.S.” What’s Your Response? http://www.prideof-america.org/2017/11/10/muslim-figure-we-must-have-pork-free-menus-or-we-will-leave-u-s-whats-your-response/ http://www.prideof-america.org/2017/11/10/muslim-figure-we-must-have-pork-free-menus-or-we-will-leave-u-s-whats-your-response/#respond Fri, 10 Nov 2017 18:13:47 +0000 http://www.prideof-america.org/?p=639 ]]>

Muslim transients have transformed into an overall issue, and the situation weakens every day. Our country has had an impressive measure of Muslim-related issues recently, yet this time pilgrims went too far. President Donald Trump had the perfect response for the issue constrained by pariahs, however Democrats didn’t support him.

Barack Obama encouraged Muslims to ask for their rights. Muslims were educated that America is an astounding country stacked with potential results. Everything thought of it as, wasn’t some time before pioneers set specific requirements. Some of these people do have issues, and need honest to goodness offer assistance. In any case, by far most of them are basically crossing the US edge to acknowledge most prominent points of interest.

President Trump understood this would change into a troublesome issue, and prescribed that our country bars outsiders from a couple of Muslim prevailing part countries. Lamentably, the travel blacklist was blocked agreeable begin, and Muslim untouchables assaulted the country.

America looks like a solid and disapproving of host, however some of its visitors are going with deadly considerations in their mind. They are consistently asking for additional. This time Muslim pilgrims made a specific demand, and it incorporates sustenance served in schools.

Muslim untouchables in Chevigny-Saint-Sauveur are endeavoring to modify the lunch menu in schools. Their game plan didn’t work, so now they are suggesting that schools offer “alternative lunch menus” that we bar any pork. In any case, Mayor Michel Rotger confronted them.

The pioneer restricted such menus to save adjacent government money. As demonstrated by Rotger, elective menus reliably incite squander. “We are setting up an operation so the youths eat everything and their eating regimens are balanced. There is too much waste so we will demonstrate them to eat meat, be it poultry or pork,” cleared up Mayor Rotger.

Liberals didn’t reevaluate before ambushing the pioneer. Paul Garrigue loathed Rotger’s decision. Garrigue is the pioneer of a social affair involved Amnesty International, the League of Human Rights, and distinctive affiliations

“Today, we are examining secularism in an all things considered threatening to Muslim way. We view secularism as a gadget of flexibility and living separately and not dismissal,” Garrigue said.

What do you think about making elective menus? Will Muslims proceed with their solicitations?

The Islamic “disobedience” in the USA is on the ascent. The Islamic populace inside the US fringes is as yet minor, yet their entryway and their partisan and FURIOUS purposeful publicity are more grounded than any minority promulgation at any point spread on American soil.

Indeed, even the African-Americans never appreciated supporting this much like the Muslims do. Be that as it may, the Muslims, educated by the liberals how to act and how “free” they should be in the USA, they began demonstrating a baffling self-importance.

Let’s be honest – The United States aren’t the main ones who have an issue with Muslim vagrants. It influences the entire world. Nonetheless, our nation has had a decent amount of repulsive episodes that include Muslims. They’ve delighted in many benefits Obama has given them, yet now, President Trump offered the ideal answer for put a conclusion to this frenzy. The main thing despite everything he needs to manage are Democrats who continue obstructing his choice, in light of their unlimited love for their Muslim companions.

The Muslims knew that America can offer them innumerable of potential outcomes amid Obama’s administration. Besides, Obama eve urged them to be louder than they ought to be, requesting anything they could consider. The issue is, they don’t simply request to have rights, they request uncommon treatment. That is the thing that their uncommon snowflake companions, the liberals, have shown them.

President Trump understood that they will be an enormous issue, so he suggested forbidding outsiders from Muslim nations, reports Founding Patriot. Sadly, his choice was blocked and now here we are.

The latest demonstration of the Muslim ‘carnivals occurred in Chevigny-Saint-Sauveur, where they need to alter school menus as indicated by their requirements. At the end of the day, they needed without pork menus. In any case, Mayor Michel Roger faced them and declined to obey to their requests.

“We are setting up an operation so the adolescents eat everything and their eating regiments are balanced. There is too much misuse so we will indicate them to eat meat, be it poultry or pork” expressed the Mayor.

What’s more, obviously, it didn’t take ache for the liberals to flame back, so this is the thing that Paul Garrigue needed to state:

“Today, we are talking about secularism in an all around antagonistic to Muslim way. We view secularism as the gadget of versatility and living separately and not dismissal.”

God favor America! On the off chance that they would prefer not to acknowledge our ways, they can backpedal to their SHITHOLES (sorry for the articulation) and live there in their dugouts without power or streets. Release them there laboring for 3$ a day.

]]>
http://www.prideof-america.org/2017/11/10/muslim-figure-we-must-have-pork-free-menus-or-we-will-leave-u-s-whats-your-response/feed/ 0
POLL: Do You Still Support The 2nd Amendment, Even After Mass Shootings? http://www.prideof-america.org/2017/11/10/poll-do-you-still-support-the-2nd-amendment-even-after-mass-shootings/ http://www.prideof-america.org/2017/11/10/poll-do-you-still-support-the-2nd-amendment-even-after-mass-shootings/#respond Fri, 10 Nov 2017 18:11:05 +0000 http://www.prideof-america.org/?p=633 ]]>

After the recent and deadly mass shooting at the country music concert in Las Vegas the left, predictably, is already using the tragedy as an excuse for more gun control.

Gun control advocates sent the hashtag #GunControlNow soaring on Twitter. The president of Media Matters tweeted snarkily, “9 AM.

Time for the parade of right-wing chorus of ‘now is not the time to talk about gun control policy’ to begin.”Does the latest mass shooting make you reconsider your support of the 2nd Amendment?  Cast your vote below

POLL: Do You Still Support The 2nd Amendment, Even After Mass Shootings?

]]>
http://www.prideof-america.org/2017/11/10/poll-do-you-still-support-the-2nd-amendment-even-after-mass-shootings/feed/ 0
Woman Shoots Person Robbing Her Home… Now The Robbers Family Is Irate At The Woman http://www.prideof-america.org/2017/11/10/woman-shoots-person-robbing-her-home-now-the-robbers-family-is-irate-at-the-woman/ http://www.prideof-america.org/2017/11/10/woman-shoots-person-robbing-her-home-now-the-robbers-family-is-irate-at-the-woman/#respond Fri, 10 Nov 2017 17:44:37 +0000 http://www.prideof-america.org/?p=634 ]]>

In what should have been an open-and-shut case, a Miami home owner shot and killed a burglar that intended to rob her property and possibly hurt or kill her.

17-year old Trevon Johnson’s final action as a human being was to invade the private residence of a Florida woman who, unfortunately for Mr. Johnson, believed in her 2nd Amendment right to protect herself with a firearm.

The police have ruled the shooting incident a case of self-defense.

Nonetheless, Johnson’s family members have made some stunning statements to the news media in response to the justified killing of the teenage home invader. They have condemned the property owner, declaring that she had no right to protect herself by shooting him while he was burglarizing her home.

Nautika Harris – Trevon Johnson’s cousin – stated,

“You have to look at it from every child’s point of view that was raised in the hood. You have to understand, how he gonna get his money to have clothes to go to school? You have to look at it from his point of view.”

Obviously, how could we have not considered that there is no earthly way that an individual can get money for school clothes without breaking into someone’s home and stealing their belongings.

In essence, Mr. Johnson’s relatives are speaking out against the woman’s right to protect herself from his attempt to invade her home, steal her private possessions, and possibly do her physical harm.

Ms. Harris added,

“I don’t care if she have her gun license or any of that. That is way beyond the law, way beyond. He was not supposed to die like this. He had a future ahead of him. Trevon had goals. He was a funny guy, very big on education, loved learning.”

While it’s very natural for a family in mourning to focus on the good qualities of somebody that they loved, especially when the last act that that person did was commit a crime, good traits and qualities are not enough to excuse their behavior.

Everybody has something good that you could say about them, even people who are openly despised by millions of Americans. Hillary Clinton, for example, has supporters who might admire her cackle, appreciate how effortlessly she lies and gets away with criminal activity, or how easily she funnels foreign money into her family charity.

However, the good traits observed by her supporters do not excuse the fact that she is a known liar, that according to the FBI did break the law, and, as Secretary of State, coordinated millions of dollars of foreign donations into her charity ahead of her presidential run.

Just as we should not give Hillary Clinton a free pass because she might have some good qualities, we do not give Trevon a pass for trying to burgle a home. Nobody deserves to die for breaking into someone else’s home, but it is an understood risk associated with the act.

After all, as many other people have pointed out, what would have happened to the home owner if she did not have her weapon when Mr. Johnson entered her home.

Finally, where was Mr. Johnson’s family when it was time to provide him with his “school clothes?” Is robbing a person’s home really the only way that they can think of to provide for their personal needs and desires?

 

]]>
http://www.prideof-america.org/2017/11/10/woman-shoots-person-robbing-her-home-now-the-robbers-family-is-irate-at-the-woman/feed/ 0
BRЕАKING: Јudgе ЅHОСKЅ Тhе Еntirе Nаtiоn With Тhе Brutаl Тruth Bеhind Тhе СIА аnd thе Dееp Ѕtаtе- Тrump Iѕ Rеаdy То Rumblе http://www.prideof-america.org/2017/11/10/br%d0%b5%d0%b0king-%d1%98udg%d0%b5-%d1%95h%d0%be%d1%81k%d1%95-%d1%82h%d0%b5-%d0%b5ntir%d0%b5-n%d0%b0ti%d0%ben-with-%d1%82h%d0%b5-brut%d0%b0l-%d1%82ruth-b%d0%b5hind-%d1%82h%d0%b5-%d1%81i%d0%b0-%d0%b0n/ http://www.prideof-america.org/2017/11/10/br%d0%b5%d0%b0king-%d1%98udg%d0%b5-%d1%95h%d0%be%d1%81k%d1%95-%d1%82h%d0%b5-%d0%b5ntir%d0%b5-n%d0%b0ti%d0%ben-with-%d1%82h%d0%b5-brut%d0%b0l-%d1%82ruth-b%d0%b5hind-%d1%82h%d0%b5-%d1%81i%d0%b0-%d0%b0n/#respond Fri, 10 Nov 2017 14:12:44 +0000 http://www.prideof-america.org/?p=630 ]]>

This is a special post, believe me patriots! Something huge happened on Fox, something important and enlightening. The United States of America suffered enough! The people from the states are sick and tired from the liberal oppression and someone has to take responsibility after Obama and his leftovers created a scandal even bigger than Watergate.

Judge Andrew Napolitano is the man who broke the ice and said the words that everybody in the USA wanted to hear. The liberal leftist created Deep State and that is a huge embarrassment because the liberal political establishment works against the will of the nation. The leftist tried to stop every bill signed by our President, the leftist want to stop the policy that the voters vouch for. Is this a democracy-is this a republic?

Judge Napolitano in his statement on Fox said wonderful and touching words. The President should be encouraged after hearing this video because the entire nation feels the same, and now is the time to protect the American values and save the country. Look what the Judge said- his words echo through history!

“The deep state has a very wise and shrewd adversary, the Man in the Oval Office. For the first time in the modern era the Man in the Oval Office is an adversary of the Deep State and not a tool of it! “
The liberal beasts once again want to use the Deep State to destroy the human, democratic and citizen rights of every American and sabotage the President. This happened many times trough history, but the brave ones will be always remembered and adored by the nation. JFK and Lincoln died for those ideals. Those are holy ideals and many of our forefathers died defending the freedom and fighting for justice for the USA. Look what just Lincoln said in his last quotes before his assassination:

“THE PEOPLE OF THESE UNITED STATES ARE THE RIGHTFUL MASTERS OF BOTH CONGRESSES AND COURTS. NOT TO OVERTHROW THE CONSTITUTION, BUT TO OVERTHROW THE MEN WHO PERVERT THE CONSTITUTION. I FEEL MORE AND MORE EVERY DAY THAT IT IS NOT AGAINST THE AMERICANS OF THE SOUTH,ALONE, I AM FIGHTING, IT IS MORE AGAINST THE POPE OF ROME AND HIS GLOBAL SERVANTS, HIS PERFIDIOUS JESUITS AND THEIR BLIND AND BLOODTHIRSTY SLAVES”.

This is a shocking truth and the history repeats. In the end dear patriots, just for the record: Hillary and Bill Clinton both went to JESUIT University and were part of Jesuit sorority/house… And many other liberals..Donald Trump is just a man from the people. He is a decent, religious man who represent the common American people who want justice. STOP THE ELITISTS – PROTECT THE PRESIDENT!

]]>
http://www.prideof-america.org/2017/11/10/br%d0%b5%d0%b0king-%d1%98udg%d0%b5-%d1%95h%d0%be%d1%81k%d1%95-%d1%82h%d0%b5-%d0%b5ntir%d0%b5-n%d0%b0ti%d0%ben-with-%d1%82h%d0%b5-brut%d0%b0l-%d1%82ruth-b%d0%b5hind-%d1%82h%d0%b5-%d1%81i%d0%b0-%d0%b0n/feed/ 0
Michigan State Police Director Under Fire For Calling NFL Players “Millionaire Ingrates Who Hate America” #o4a #NFLBoycott http://www.prideof-america.org/2017/11/10/michigan-state-police-director-under-fire-for-calling-nfl-players-millionaire-ingrates-who-hate-america-o4a-nflboycott/ http://www.prideof-america.org/2017/11/10/michigan-state-police-director-under-fire-for-calling-nfl-players-millionaire-ingrates-who-hate-america-o4a-nflboycott/#respond Fri, 10 Nov 2017 14:07:39 +0000 http://www.prideof-america.org/?p=627 ]]>

The Michigan State Police says an internal investigation will determine whether the agency’s director will be disciplined for sharing a Facebook post that called some NFL players “anti-American degenerates.”

Spokeswoman Shanon Banner said in an email Friday that Col. Kriste Kibbey Etue will be treated the same as any other state police employee accused of misconduct.

Banner says if Etue is found to have violated agency policy, she could receive a written reprimand or a five-day suspension.

Etue has apologized, and Gov. Rick Snyder says he won’t fire her. Some legislators, white-hate groups and others want her out.

Etue shared a post signed “we the people.” It calls NFL players who kneel during the national anthem “millionaire ingrates who hate America and disrespect our armed forces and veterans.”

Shanon Banner, a spokeswoman for Etue, said the colonel’s Facebook post was not about race, and was posted not publicly, but so that only Etue’s friends would see it,reports WZZM.

“As a public servant, Col. Etue has great respect for the armed forces and those who fight to protect our freedoms, Banner said in an e-mail to the Free Press.

Etue did not create the post, Banner said. “It’s a meme that is posted in other places around the Internet,” she said.

]]>
http://www.prideof-america.org/2017/11/10/michigan-state-police-director-under-fire-for-calling-nfl-players-millionaire-ingrates-who-hate-america-o4a-nflboycott/feed/ 0
WATCH: OBAMA DEMANDS TO REMOVE ALL JESUS SYMBOLS BEFORE HE WOULD SPEAK AT THE UNIVERSITY http://www.prideof-america.org/2017/11/10/watch-obama-demands-to-remove-all-jesus-symbols-before-he-would-speak-at-the-university/ http://www.prideof-america.org/2017/11/10/watch-obama-demands-to-remove-all-jesus-symbols-before-he-would-speak-at-the-university/#respond Fri, 10 Nov 2017 14:04:22 +0000 http://www.prideof-america.org/?p=624 ]]>

He can speak at mosques and visit there, but when it comes to Christianity…
Watch & Share!

Watch: Obama Demands to Remove All Jesus Symbols Before He Would Speak At The University

He can speak at mosques and visit there, but when it comes to Christianity…
Watch & Share!

Watch: Obama Demands to Remove All Jesus Symbols Before He Would Speak At The University

 

WATCH: OBAMA DEMANDS TO REMOVE ALL JESUS SYMBOLS BEFORE HE WOULD SPEAK AT THE UNIVERSITY

]]>
http://www.prideof-america.org/2017/11/10/watch-obama-demands-to-remove-all-jesus-symbols-before-he-would-speak-at-the-university/feed/ 0
TAKE OUR POLL : DID YOU SUPPORT JUDGE JEANINE AS TRUMP’S SUPREME COURT PICK? http://www.prideof-america.org/2017/11/10/take-our-poll-did-you-support-judge-jeanine-as-trumps-supreme-court-pick/ http://www.prideof-america.org/2017/11/10/take-our-poll-did-you-support-judge-jeanine-as-trumps-supreme-court-pick/#respond Fri, 10 Nov 2017 13:59:23 +0000 http://www.prideof-america.org/?p=620 ]]>

 

     She has been a voice for a millions of disaffected Americans and has assisted in the rise of
     President Donald Trump.
]]>
http://www.prideof-america.org/2017/11/10/take-our-poll-did-you-support-judge-jeanine-as-trumps-supreme-court-pick/feed/ 0